This comic illustrates perfectly what a peer review shouldn't look like.
I'm doing a major redesign on one of our core classes, and it's a normal step for us to request a peer review when we've got something substantial to show.
As I just finished my draft of the 100+ page workbook, I asked the crew for a 1 hour review this morning.
For us, a peer review is informal - taking place in our sofa-furnished brainstorm lab, with post-it notes for everyone.
Here are my top five benefits of a peer review.
- Everyone gets to know what you're working on - This kills any duplication of effort, consolidates resources, and makes sure you don't end up on anyone's project plan ("I didn't think you were busy").
- You learn - I got six great suggestions from the team. Things I wouldn't have thought of on my own.
- You build momentum - Seeing their enthusiasm re-doubled my enthusiasm. After all the work, I was a little burnt-out. Not any more!!
- Talking brings clarity - I worked on this course in silence for too long. It's really helpful to get words out of your head and into the air, so you can hear how dumb they sound - and then improve them.
- You get buy-in - No one can tell you later that it sucks, unless they're willing to assume some responsibility.
Now, depending on your team dynamics, all five of these could be potentially frightening.
Fortunately, my team is fairly functional (if you don't count me...), so these are productive sessions.
Do you do peer reviews? Tell us about them...
2 comments:
Hey, were's the link to the source of that comic?
The title "Peer review" contains the link (hence the blue color)
It's a great site, I recommend checking it out!
Post a Comment